Glean.com vs Unleash.so

Two productivity-AI companies going head-to-head.

Welcome to The Wireframe – your no-BS guide to digital copy and design done right.

Today’s matchup: Glean.com vs. Unleash.so — two sites vying for the same seat at the productivity-AI table. Neither one falls flat, neither one nails it top-to-bottom. But if they ever had a baby? It’d be a homepage that slaps.

Let’s dig into what works, what doesn’t, and where each of these sites could borrow from the other to actually stick the landing.

Glean – Polished, Broad, and (Almost) Too Friendly

✅ Clean Layout, Clear Visual Hierarchy
Glean.com greets you with white space, crisp fonts, and a clean layout that actually lets your eyes breathe. It's a rare moment of calm in the AI software arms race. No endless carousels or motion sickness-inducing animations—just straightforward sections that lead you down the page like a well-paced story.

✅ The Time Saved Graphic Hits
Telling me I’ll save 110+ hours a year? Yes, please. And better yet—it’s visual, memorable, and doesn’t take a wall of copy to get across. Every SaaS site wants to talk ROI; Glean shows it with restraint and clarity.

✅ CTAs Where You Need Them, Not Where You Don’t
Glean knows when to ask. You’ll spot calls to action like “Get a Demo” and “See Product Overview” placed exactly where they make sense—inviting, not intrusive. I would change “See Product Overview” ➡️ “See Glean in Action” CTA. No flashing buttons, no pop-ups stalking your scroll—just confident pacing.

⚠️ Messaging That’s... for Everyone?
“Work AI for all.” Neat idea, vague execution. Who is “all”? A recruiter? A VP of Sales? An intern? Glean feels like it could help anyone with a laptop and a to-do list—but the message gets fuzzy fast. Until they niche down or sharpen their ICP, the broad stroke could lose people who want specifics.

⚠️ Product-Focused to a Fault
There’s a solid suite of resources and features laid out, but the voice? A little cold. A little robotic. It leans hard on showing the product and less on telling a story. The design’s doing a lot of heavy lifting—and it works—but add a bit of brand warmth and this could go from solid to sticky.

Unleash – Smart Positioning, Cluttered Execution

~37 screenshots later~

✅ Messaging That Knows Its Audience
"Enterprise AI Platform.” Boom. We know who you’re talking to. Not freelancers, not solopreneurs—enterprises. The copy up top speaks with intent, and that matters. You can imagine the C-suite scanning this page and saying, “Okay, worth a demo.”

✅ Use Cases by Department
Unleash makes it clear this isn’t just for IT. Sales, support, engineering—they’re all covered. The site does a decent job of selling the versatility without sounding like a generic AI cure-all.

✅ Trust Signals Are There (Sort of)
Logos from Wiz, Monday, Chili Piper... solid social proof if your audience knows them. A little more context or testimonials would help—right now, it’s trust badges, not trust builders.

⚠️ Design That Can’t Sit Still
Unleash feels like five design teams merged into one slide deck. The site’s visually louder than Glean—and not in a good way. Fonts jump in size, color palettes clash, and some of the graphics feel more like filler than function.

⚠️ Too Much, Too Soon
You’re hit with a wall of text up top, then more copy below, and suddenly you’re six scrolls in wondering what you just read. It’s not that the information isn’t useful—it’s that the pacing is off. The experience starts to feel more like a white paper than a website.

⚠️ CTAs That Ask Too Much, Too Soon
Unleash pushes both “Get a Demo” and “Get Started,” but both require a form or email before you see anything. No clear path for casual exploration. Compared to Glean’s let-you-browse-first approach, it feels like you’re being asked to commit before the first date.

Quick Takeaway

Glean.com has the edge in visual polish and flow. Unleash.so wins on message clarity and audience targeting. But both could learn from each other.

If Glean borrowed Unleash’s sharp positioning and enterprise language, and Unleash adopted Glean’s UX calm and copy restraint, we’d be looking at a near-perfect site. Until then, it’s a classic case of “great parts, unfinished whole.”

My Favorite Tool This Week: Cal.com

Scheduling tools usually feel like a necessary evil—clunky, rigid, and weirdly proud of making people “pick a time.” Cal.com flips that. It’s open-source, clean, and actually gives you control instead of boxing you into someone else’s idea of productivity. You can brand it, bend it, and build it out however you want, and your “Let’s find time” emails can finally die a quiet death.

Cal.com vs Calendly.com coming next week, stay tuned.

Want your site reviewed in The Wireframe? Hit reply. We don’t bite.